Social Predictors of Pragmatic Skills and Conversational Maxims in Children

Authors

  • Iqra Saeed MS Speech and Language Pathology, Centre for Clinical Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/FL25.159

Keywords:

Pragmatics, Conversational maxims, social predictors, Wh-questions, Picture elicitation

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the relationship among social predictors and pragmatic skills and conversational Maxims in children. For such purpose, children between age ranges 5-5.12 years and 6-6.12 years (N=66; males 33 and females 33) were selected from four private schools of Jhang Sadar( 2 Advanced and 2 less Advanced school systems).Cross sectional research design and purposive sampling were used for this study. Pearson moment correlation and independent sample t test were used to compute values. There was no notable relation found among social predictors and pragmatic skills and conversational maxims in children between ages 5 – 7 years. The relationship between social predictors and conversational maxims was only significant at Quantity subscale. Whereas the relationship between subscales of conversational maxims was significant at Quality and Relevance. And with Pragmatic skills’ subscales it was significant at Explanation and Knowledge. So, Quantity Maxim of Conversational implicatures predicts family system and types of schooling more significantly. Whereas Quality and Relevance of Conversational Implicatures predict subscales of Pragmatic skills ( Explanation and Relevance) more significantly. There was no prediction of overall scores of conversational Maxims and Pragmatic skills.

Author Biography

  • Iqra Saeed, MS Speech and Language Pathology, Centre for Clinical Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Times of California, 12(5). http://dx.doi.org./10.1002/wics.101

Arundale, R. B. ( 2015). Face Constituting Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (1st ed.). http://dx.doi:10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi094

Bamberg, M. (2016). Language, interaction, and culture. The Sage Encyclopedia of Theory in Psychology, 498-500. http://dx.doi.org./10.4135/9781483346274.n174

Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. (2007, January 17). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339-2349. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2642103

Davies, B. L. (2007). Grice's Cooperative Principle: Meaning and rationality. Journal of pragmatics, 39(12), 2308-2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.09.002

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Kakepoto, H. (2001). Sociological impact of social change upon institutions of family with special focus on Pakistan. Presented in International Conference on Business and Social Science Research.

Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Language, Speech, And Communication. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001

Nicholas, A., & Lascarides, A. ( 1998). The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition. Journal of semantics, 15(3), 239-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/15.3.239

Siebel. M., & Alston, W. P. (2001). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-06201012

Sedivy, J. C. (2007, April 13). Implicature During Real Time Conversation: A View from Language Processing Research, Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00082.x

Downloads

Published

2025-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Saeed, I. (2025). Social Predictors of Pragmatic Skills and Conversational Maxims in Children. The Regional Tribune, 4(4), 212-224. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/FL25.159