Embedded Intentions in Expressions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Doha Peace Agreement (DPA)

Authors

  • Salma Naz Khattak Lecturer (English), Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4209-1617
  • Muhammad Ayaz PhD Scholar, Department of Peace & Conflict Studies, National Defense University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Maria Rehman Lecturer (English), Department of International Relations, National Defense University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/FL25.179

Keywords:

Afghan Taliban, Unites States Exit, Establishment of Peace, Fairclough Model of CDA, Inclusive Government, Countering Terrorism

Abstract

Doha Peace Agreement (DPA) was inked on 29 February 2021 to pave way for the United States (US) exit from Afghanistan after the war on terror for around twenty years and to secure guarantees from Afghan Taliban regarding not letting anyone or any group use Afghan soil for terrorism against the US and its allies. The US started withdrawing troops but Taliban advance towards Kabul ahead of the agreed time, forced President Ashraf Ghani to flee. Taliban took over Kabul on 15 August 2021 and once in total control did not initiate intra-Afghan dialogue and refused to form an inclusive government, violating its commitments. This study is aimed to explain the content of the DPA qualitatively using the Fairclough model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) for failing its objectives. The findings of the study highlight that USA framed a specific discourse in the agreement apparently objectifying the establishment of peace in Afghanistan as its core aim and justifying its decision to withdraw from Afghanistan. However, USA failed to realize the importance of a strong guarantor and defined guarantees in the agreement to ensure that once the Taliban are back in power, must adhere to the terms of the agreement. The agreement also neglected the issues of an inclusive government, women’s rights, and freedom of speech. The study has extending consequences on the U.S. hegemonic discourse about countering terrorism strategies and conflict resolution as it tends to fail in the case of Afghanistan because of the way the discourse of DPA was drafted.

Author Biography

  • Salma Naz Khattak, Lecturer (English), Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Ademilokun, M. A. (2019). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of modality in social transformation campaigns in Nigeria. Discourse and Interaction, 12(2), 5-28. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=894482

Amalia, R. M. (2019). Textual analysis of power of the government of Indonesia and Aceh in the Helsinki MoU. Teknosastik, 17(1), 1-6. https://ejurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/teknosastik/article/view/247

Bell, C., & O'rourke, C. (2010). Peace agreements or pieces of paper? The impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on peace processes and their agreements. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 59(4), 941-980. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931000062X

Bergen, P. L. (2023, March 17). September 11 attacks. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/event/September-11-attacks

Bormann, N. C., & Elbadawi, I. (2021). The Juba Power-Sharing Peace Agreement: Will It Promote Peace and Democratic Transition in Sudan? Economic Research Forum (ERF). https://erf.org.eg/app/uploads/2021/10/1633343525_360_781742_1490.pdf

Cajiao, C., León, J. F., & Ordoñez, E. J. (2021). Critical Analysis of the Discourse of the Peace Agreement in Colombia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1-10. https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/critical-analysis-of-the-discourse-of-the-peace-agreement-in-colombia-12344.html

Council on Foreign Relation (2022, October 19). Instability in Afghanistan. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/war-afghanistan

D’Acquisto, G. (2017). A linguistic analysis of diplomatic discourse: UN resolutions on the question of Palestine. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Eager, P. W. (2013). From freedom fighters to terrorists: Women and political violence. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Epstein, C. (2008). The power of words in international relations: Birth of an anti-whaling discourse. Mit Press.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 7(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman

Gee, J. P. (2001). identity as an analytic lens for research. Review of research in education 25.1 99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322

Hakimi, M. J., & Ashe, S. (2020). The US-Taliban Agreement and the Afghan peace process. Standford Law School. https://law.stanford.edu/2020/12/07/the-u-s-taliban-agreement-and-the-afghan-peace-process/

Hassen, R. (2015). Discourse as Medium of Knowledge: Transmission of Knowledge by Transmission of Discourse People Live. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31), 119-128. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083383.pdf

Horváth, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. In Language, literature and culture in a changing transatlantic world, international conference proceedings. Presov: University of Presov (pp. 45-56).

Inzunza, E. R. (2020). Reconsidering the use of the passive voice in scientific writing. The American Biology Teacher, 82(8), 563-565. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.8.563

Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 18(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180302

Javaid, A., Afzal, H., Zafran, F., & Iqbal, Z. (2021). Persuasion in PM Imran Khan’s Speeches Concerning Pulwama Incident: A Political Discourse Analysis. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(08), 1353-1364. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/8935

Maizland, L. (2020). US-Taliban peace deal: What to know. Council on Foreign Relations, 2. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-taliban-peace-deal-agreement-afghanistan-war

Mehmood, S., Sulaiman, S., & Jabbar, A. (2022). Discourse analysis of the US War on Terror policy in Afghanistan. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(1), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.34

Pehar, D. (2001). Use of ambiguities in peace agreements. Language and diplomacy, 163-200. https://www.diplomacy.edu/resource/use-of-ambiguities-in-peace-agreements/

Reports on the protection of civilians in armed conflict. (2022, December 12). https://unama.unmissions.org/protection-of-civilians-reports

Salami, M. (2021). Navigating influence in Afghanistan: The cases of Qatar and Pakistan. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/navigating-influence-afghanistan-cases-qatar-and-pakistan

Schmied, J. (2020). Limits of discourse: Examples from political, academic, and human-agent interaction. Discourse and interaction, 13(2), 89-118. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=975554

Schwarz, J. R. M., & Mackey, R. (2017). All the times Donald Trump said the US should get out of Afghanistan. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2017/08/21/donald-trump-afghanistan-us-get-out/

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2005). Discourse and intercultural communication. The handbook of discourse analysis, 537-547. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch28

Sibtain, M., Aslam, M. Z., Zia-ur-Rehman, D., & Qasim, H. M. (2021). A study of rhetorical element and political persuasion in Trump’s speech at UNGA 74th session: A political discourse analysis. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(08), 1428-1439. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/8945

Sneddon, J. N. (1996). Indonesian a Comprehensive Grammar.UK: Routledge.

Sujatna. (2007). English Syntax for Beginners. Bandung: Uvula Press.

Suppan, A. (2019). 13. The Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 10 September 1919.

True, J., & Riveros-Morales, Y. (2019). Towards inclusive peace: Analysing gender-sensitive peace agreements 2000–2016. International Political Science Review, 40(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118808608

Van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Context models in discourse processing. The construction of mental representations during reading, 123-148.

Williams, P. R., & Simpson, M. (2011). Drafting in Doha: an assessment of the Darfur peace process and ceasefire agreements. MONOPOLY OF FORCE, THE NEXUS OF DDR AND SSR, 41. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2033288

Wise, L. (2018). Setting aside the “others”: Exclusion amid inclusion of non-dominant minorities in peace agreements. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 24(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2018.1489509

Yousafzai, S., Boone, J., & Rasmussen, S. E. (2016). Taliban and Afghanistan restart secret talks in Qatar. The Guardian, 18. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/18/taliban-afghanistan-secret-talks-qatar

Zartman, I. W. (2019). I William Zartman: A Pioneer in Conflict Management and Area Studies (p. 225). New York: Springer.

Zhang, J. (2019). A semantic approach to the English modality. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 879-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.28

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khattak, S. N., Ayaz, M., & Rehman, M. (2025). Embedded Intentions in Expressions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Doha Peace Agreement (DPA). The Regional Tribune, 4(4), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/FL25.179