Rhetoric of Violence in Political Discourses: A Comparative Study of Pakistani Politicians’ Speeches

Authors

  • Saria Saeed M.Phil. Scholar, Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Mahar Akbar Jatyal M.Phil. Scholar, Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Muhammad Akbar Sajid Head of English Department, National University of Modern Languages, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63062/trt/V24.023

Keywords:

Rhetoric, Political Discourse, Persuasion, Ideology, CDA, Violence, Politicians

Abstract

Language plays a significant role in determining what goes on in an individual's mind. Politicians use language insidiously and persuasively to impart their ideologies and to win the consent of the general masses. Moreover, they also use certain lexicons to otherize the others. Speeches are delivered by politicians for positive self-representation and negative others representation. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of political discourses. For this purpose, the speeches of three Pakistani politicians, namely Imran Khan, Maryam Nawaz and Bilawal Bhutto, have been analysed from Sept. 2021 to May 2023. It is analysed how they exercise political rhetoric using different linguistic spins. The theoretical framework, including Paul Chilton (2004) Discourse Space Theory, is employed for this study. The data is taken from the YouTube channel of Pakistani news channels, namely ARY and SAMMA TV. The findings reveal that politicians make use of various discursive spins and rhetorical strategies to others.

Author Biography

  • Saria Saeed, M.Phil. Scholar, Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. London: Routledge

Berlin, J. A. (1992). Poststructuralism, cultural studies, and the composition classroom: Postmodern theory in practice. Rhetoric Review, 11(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199209388984

Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Chilton, P. (2005). Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 78-116.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Feltham-King, Tracey, & Macleod, C. (2016). How content analysis may complement and extend the insights of discourse analysis: An example of research on constructions of abortion in South African newspapers 1978-2005. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624575

Inayat, A. (2019). Discourse of Power: Critical Discourse Analysis of Imran Khan’s pre- and Post-Election Speeches [Graduation thesis], University of Gujrat.

Khajavi, Y., & Rasti, A. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politicians' use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of U.S. election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051

Khalil, U., Islam, M., Chattha, S. A., & Qazalbash, F. (2017). Persuasion and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Imran Khan's election speech (2013). Pakistan Vision, 18(2), 193-210.

Khan, A. (2021). Stylistic Analysis Of The Discursive Techniques Employed By Politicians To Propagate Their Ideology. NUML Islamabad

Khan, M. H., Qazalbash, F., Adnan, H. M., Yaqin, L. N., & Khuhro, R. A. (2021). Trump and Muslims: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Islamophobic Rhetoric in Donald Trump’s Selected Tweets. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211004172

Latupeirissa, D. S., Laksana, I. K. D., Artawa, K., & Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. (2019). On political language ideology: Critical view of Indonesian president speech. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 843. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.23

Nusrat, A., Khan, S., & Shehzadi, Ms. S. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis of Imran Khan Dharna Speeches in Socio-Political Perspective. Sjesr, 3(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss1-2020(9-19)

Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927

Shafiq, Z. (2021). Discourse of political hate speech on Twitter in Pakistan. Harf-o-Sukhan, 5(4), 230-245. https://harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-o-sukhan/article/view/225

van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and Ideologies in the Press. Approaches to media discourse/Blackwell. Oxford: Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T. (2006), Discourse and Power. Houndsmills: Palgrave

Wodak, R. (2001), What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R.Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.).Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Thousand Oaks - New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Published

2024-11-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Saeed, S., Jatyal, M. A., & Sajid, M. A. . (2024). Rhetoric of Violence in Political Discourses: A Comparative Study of Pakistani Politicians’ Speeches. The Regional Tribune, 3(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.63062/trt/V24.023