From Cash Transfers to Integrated Development: A Comparative Study of Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program (BISP) and China's Jingzhun Fupin Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-viii.377Keywords:
Benazir Income Support Program (BISP), Jingzhun Fupin, Precision Poverty Alleviation, Pakistan, China, Social Protection, Integrated Development, Sustainable LivelihoodsAbstract
Poverty is one of the most enduring challenges to sustainable development, social inclusion and economic resilience in developing countries. Many governments have framed social protection policies aimed at addressing poverty and vulnerability, yet there are variations in policy design, mechanisms of implementation and long-term effects. The Benazir Income Support Program (BISP), launched in Pakistan in 2008, has been designed to provide Unconditional and Conditional Cash Transfers to socially and economically vulnerable households, especially women. BISP has made significant strides in improving household consumption, food security and educational participation, but its sustainability in supporting beneficiaries to sustain themselves remains a concern. On the other hand, the Jingzhun Fupin (Precision Poverty Alleviation) Program in China, launched in 2013, took a comprehensive and household-centric strategy, integrating income support, job creation, industrial development, education and health care, infrastructure, relocation and institutional responsibility. The program has been highly credited for achieving the target of eradicating extreme rural poverty by 2020. This study is a qualitative comparative review of both programs, based on peer-reviewed journal articles, government documents and reports from international bodies. It uses a thematic comparative approach to examine variations in policy goals, governance, targeting and implementation approaches, investment in human capital, livelihoods development, monitoring, and poverty reduction results. The paper concludes that while BISP has been effective in alleviating income deprivation in the short term, Pakistan needs to move towards an integrated development approach that goes beyond social protection and provides productive employment, rural transformation, digital governance and institutional coordination.
References
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Ambler, K., & de Brauw, A. (2017). The impacts of cash transfers on women's empowerment: Learning from Pakistan's Benazir Income Support Program. World Bank Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirial analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press.
Benazir Income Support Programme. (2024). Annual Report 2023-2024. Government of Pakistan
Benazir Income Support Programme. (2024). National Socio-Economic Registry (NSER). Government of Pakistan.
Cheema, I., Hunt, S., Javed, S., Lone, T., O'Leary, S., & Pellerano, L. (2014). Benazir Income Support Programme: First follow-up impact evaluation report. Oxford Policy Management.
Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection. IDS Working Paper 232. Institute of Development Studies.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human Development Report 2023/2024. UNDP.
World Bank. (2013). Social protection in Pakistan. World Bank.
World Bank. (2015). Reaching the poorest through strengthening the social safety net system in Pakistan. World Bank.
World Bank (2016). Cash transfers help Pakistan’s poorest. World Bank.
World Bank. (2020). Responsive social protection program and system to serve Pakistan’s poorest people. World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Four decades of poverty reduction in China: Drivers, insights for the world, and the way ahead. World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council of the People's Republic of China.
World Bank. (2024). Poverty and Inequality Platform: Pakistan country profile. World Bank.
Xu, C. (2017). China's targeted poverty alleviation strategy and its implementation. China Agricultural Economic Review.
Xi, J. (2022). Up and out of poverty. Foreign Languages Press.
Zhang, L., & Luo, R. (2020). Precision poverty alleviation in rural China: Policy innovation and governance effectiveness. China Economic Review.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


