Economic Development and Breadth of Outreach as Contextual Conditions for Financial Self-Sufficiency: A Configurational Analysis of Microfinance Institutions

Authors

  • Rikza Sarosh PhD Scholar, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Safdar Husain Tahir Associate Professor, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Rizwan Kamran Assistant Professor, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Syed Ahmad Hassan Gillani Assistant Professor, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-viii.386

Keywords:

Economic Development, Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Financial Self-Sufficiency

Abstract

This research uses an asymmetric configurational approach to analyse outreach breadth and economic development, considering contextual inputs that shape pathways to financial self-sufficiency among microfinance institutions. Panel data cover 1,295 microfinance institutions from 2009 to 2019 and are sourced from the World Bank (MIX Market) database. The study uses contextual conditions, including breadth of outreach, portfolio at risk, management inefficiency, active borrowers, capital structure, and economic development. The analysis of necessary conditions reveals that no individual condition is sufficient to produce a high level of financial self-sufficiency, indicating that financial self-sufficiency cannot be attributed solely to any single condition. However, sufficiency analysis suggests that outreach breadth is an important core condition for financial self-sufficiency, while economic development is not. None of the individual conditions—breadth of outreach, portfolio at risk, management inefficiency, active borrowers, capital structure, or economic development—met the threshold for a high Financial Sustainability Score (FSS), emphasising that sustainability cannot be sufficiently explained by a solitary factor. From 2009 to 2019, BOTR remained a core condition in the sufficiency analysis. In 2009, 2014, and 2019, active borrowers, outreach scope, and management inefficiency were among the most significant factors across most pathways, underscoring their vital role in underpinning MFI performance. Capital structure, portfolio at risk, and economic development were context- and time-dependent, with their effects being core conditions in some configurations and absent in others. In conclusion, the findings support equifinality and causal asymmetry, as different combinations of institutional and contextual factors can lead an MFI to achieve high financial self-sufficiency.

Author Biography

  • Rikza Sarosh, PhD Scholar, Lyallpur Business School, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Abusharbeh, M. T. (2023). Modeling the factors of portfolio at risk for microfinance institutions in Palestine. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2186042

Ahlin, C., Lin, J., & Maio, M. (2011). Where does microfinance flourish? Microfinance institution performance in macroeconomic context. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.04.004

Ahmed, M., Tahir, S. H., & Gulzar Ahmad. (2023). Fostering inclusive growth: Exploring gender dynamics and loan sizes in Microfinance institutions. ANNALS OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PERSPECTIVE, 4(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.52700/assap.v4i2.301

Armendáriz, B., & Labie, M. (2011). The handbook of Microfinance. https://doi.org/10.1142/7645

Armendáriz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On mission drift in Microfinance institutions. The Handbook of Microfinance, 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814295666_0016

Aslam, M., Kumar, S., & Sorooshian, S. (2018). Social versus financial performance of Microfinance: Bangladesh perspective. Research in World Economy, 10(3), 263. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v10n3p263

Awaworyi Churchill, S. (2019). Microfinance financial sustainability and outreach: Is there a trade-off? Empirical Economics, 59(3), 1329-1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01709-1

Bogan, V. L. (2012). Capital structure and sustainability: An empirical study of Microfinance institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1045-1058. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00223

Cull, R., Demirgu¨ç‐Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading Microbanks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F107-F133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02017.x

Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2011). Does regulatory supervision curtail Microfinance profitability and outreach? World Development, 39(6), 949-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.016

Fan, B., Zhao, H., Kamran, H. W., & Tahir, S. H. (2023). Environmental sustainability targets: The role of green investment, ICT development, and economic growth. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2151490

Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120

Haq, M., Skully, M., & Pathan, S. (2009). Efficiency of Microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(1), 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-009-9103-7

Harkat, T., Aguenaou, S., Abrache, J., & Ez-zarzari, Z. (2023). Impact of loan portfolio characteristics on microfinance institutions: The case of Morocco. African Review of Economics and Finance, 15(2), 101-121.

Hartarska, V., & Nadolnyak, D. (2007). Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? cross-country evidence. Applied Economics, 39(10), 1207-1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500461840

Hartarska, V., Nadolnyak, D., & Mersland, R. (2014). Are women better bankers to the poor? Evidence from rural Microfinance institutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(5), 1291-1306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau061

Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Meesters, A. (2011). Outreach and efficiency of Microfinance institutions. World Development, 39(6), 938-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.018

Hussain, M., Rehman, R. U., Bashir, U., & Faisal, F. (2025). Examining employee well-being and financial performance in microfinance institutions: Insights from cross-country analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-025-00458-5

Imai, K. S., Arun, T., & Annim, S. K. (2010). Microfinance and household poverty reduction: New evidence from India. World Development, 38(12), 1760-1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.04.006

Ledgerwood, J. (1998). Microfinance handbook: An institutional and financial perspective. World Bank Publications.

Marwa, N., & Aziakpono, M. (2015). Financial sustainability of tanzanian saving and credit cooperatives. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(10), 870-887. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-06-2014-0127

Megersa, K. (2020). Improving SMEs’ access to finance through capital markets and innovative financing instruments: some evidence from developing countries.

Mersland, R., & Øystein Strøm, R. (2009). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(4), 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.009

Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2016). Embracing causal complexity. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252

Mushtaq, R., & Bruneau, C. (2019). Microfinance, financial inclusion and ICT: Implications for poverty and inequality. Technology in Society, 59, 101154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101154

Nyamsogoro, G. D. (2010). Financial sustainability of rural micro finance institutions (MFIs) in Tanzania The University of Greenwich].

Ragin, C. C. (2008). What is qualitative comparative analysis?

Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago press.

Rahman, M. A., & Mazlan, A. R. (2014). Determinants of financial sustainability of Microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n9p107

Raza, M. M., Tahir, S. H., Raza, H., Fadhil Ali, A., & Rahat Alvi, A. (2023). Board characteristics and firm performance: A Configurational analysis. JISR management and social sciences & economics, 21(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2023.21.1.4

Remer, L., & Kattilakoski, H. (2021). Microfinance institutions’ operational self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-021-00059-5

Rosenberg, R. (2009). Measuring results of microfinance institutions: Minimum indicators that donors and investors should track-A technical guide.

Sainz-Fernandez, I., Torre-Olmo, B., López-Gutiérrez, C., & Sanfilippo-Azofra, S. (2018). Development of the financial sector and growth of Microfinance institutions: The moderating effect of economic growth. Sustainability, 10(11), 3930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113930

Hussain, S., Sarosh, R., Afzal, M., Khalid, W., & Tabasam, A. H. (2026). Do human development matters? Evidence on Microfinance institutions' financial self-sufficiency around the globe. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 286. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.vii-iii.26571

Hadžiahmetović, N. (2021). Factors determining the operational self-sufficiency of microfinance institutions. Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, 7(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/crebss-2021-0006

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139004244

Singh, A. K., & Singh, R. (2025). Implications of digital infrastructure on social sustainability in global countries. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance, 381-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0843-0_19

Singh, K. (2024). Economics and financial sustainability in microfinancing: do investment flows toward developing countries, rural areas, microenterprises and female borrowers foster institutionalization? Studies in Economics and Finance.

Tahir, S. H., Ullah, M. R., Ahmad, G., Syed, N., & Qadir, A. (2021). Women in top management: Performance of firms and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010087

Tahir, S. H., Wang, X., Zulfiqar, M., Ullah, M. R., & Sajid, M. A. (2025). The synergistic impact of digital technology and financial systems on sustainable environment. Natural Resources Forum, 50(2), 892-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12603

Ullah, M. R. (2023). From pixels to profits: Configurations of digital alchemy for SMEs excellence. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(III). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-iii)66

Ullah, M. R., Tahir, S. H., Ahmed, M., & Khan, M. J. (2025). The role of digitalization and digital capabilities in financial performance: A Multilayer perceptron-based hybrid SEM-ANNs approach. International Journal of Business and Society, 26(2), 548-569. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7878.2025

Ullah, M. R., Tahir, S. H., Shahzadi, H., & Kamran, H. W. (2023). Digital pathways to success: The transformative power of digitalization and digital capabilities on SMEs’ financial performance. iRASD Journal of Economics, 5(2), 465-485. https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2023.0502.0140

Ullah, M. R., Tahir, S. H., Zulfiqar, M., & Tabasam, A. H. (2026). Role of digitalisation and digital capabilities in the non-financial performance of SMEs: A multi-method SEM-fsqca-ANNs approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2026.2685695

Xu, X., Tahir, S. H., Khan, K. B., Sajid, M. A., & Safdar, M. A. (2024). Beyond regression: Unpacking research of human complex systems with qualitative comparative analysis. Heliyon, 10(10), e31457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31457

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Sarosh, R., Tahir, S. H., Kamran, R., & Gillani, S. A. H. (2026). Economic Development and Breadth of Outreach as Contextual Conditions for Financial Self-Sufficiency: A Configurational Analysis of Microfinance Institutions. The Regional Tribune, 5(8), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-viii.386