Geoeconomic Fragmentation and FDI Reallocation in Emerging Economies: The Role of Political Alignment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-viii.393Keywords:
Geoeconomic Fragmentation, Foreign Direct Investment, Political Alignment, UN General Assembly, Emerging Markets, Friend-shoring, Connector EconomiesAbstract
This study investigates whether the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and political alignment between countries has changed due to geoeconomic fragmentation in emerging market and developing economies. A source-host-year panel combines United Nations General Assembly ideal-point distances with the International Monetary Fund Direct Investment Positions by Counterpart Economy dataset. The main sample spans 2010-2024 and includes 125,239 annual observations, 86 emerging/developing host economies, 192 investor economies, and 12,787 bilateral dyads. The preferred specification transforms officially reported inward FDI positions using an inverse hyperbolic sine transformation and includes dyad, host-year, and investor-year fixed effects. The post-2022 marginal effect is estimated imprecisely but is statistically significant and negative (beta = -0.0536; clustered p = 0.037), and it captures the incremental interaction between political distance and the post-2022 period. In 2024, FDI inflows and announced greenfield capital expenditure (capEX) followed a similar trajectory of selective reallocation, though not deglobalization, with India reporting a 13% increase in FDI, China a 29% decrease, and ASEAN a record US$235 billion. Digital-economy investment reached US$360 billion globally during 2020-2024, with India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Viet Nam, Mexico, Brazil and Thailand among the top developing-country destinations. A connector screen highlights economies where weak bilateral FDI exposure converged with high geopolitical distance after 2022 among emerging economies. The evidence is descriptive, not causal. Overall, findings support a qualified fragmentation interpretation: productive investment remained driven by market fundamentals, sectoral opportunities and connection roles, while political alignment grew in significance after 2022.
References
Ahn, J. (2023). Fragmenting foreign direct investment hits emerging economies hardest. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/04/05/fragmenting-foreign-direct-investment-hits-emerging-economies-hardest.
Ahn, J., Carton, B., Habib, A., Malacrino, D., Muir, D., & Presbitero, A. (2023). Geoeconomic fragmentation and foreign direct investment. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/weo/2023/april/english/ch4.pdf
Alfaro, L., & Chor, D. (2023). Global supply chains: The looming “Great reallocation”. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31661.
Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214.
Bailey, M. A., Strezhnev, A., & Voeten, E. (2016). Estimating dynamic state preferences from United Nations voting data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), 430-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715595700.
Blonigen, B. A. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(4), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-005-2868-9.
Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.02.003.
Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372.
Gopinath, G., Gourinchas, P., Presbitero, A., & Topalova, P. (2024). Changing global linkages: A New Cold War? https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400272745.001.a001.
Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and cookbook. Handbook of International Economics, 131-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3.
Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1086/261236.
Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334-364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/16.2.334.
IMF. (2026). World Economic Outlook, April 2026: Statistical Appendix—Classification of Economies. Washington, DC: IMF; 2026. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/weo/2026/april/english/statsappendix.pdf
Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587-616. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818303573040.
OECD. (2024). FDI flows by counterpart area, BMD4. OECD. Oecd.Org. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?df.
Silva, J. M., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
Tan, J. (2024). How widespread is FDI fragmentation? IMF Working Papers, 2024(179), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400281211.001
UNCTAD. (2025a). Global Investment Trends Monitor No. 48. Geneva: UNCTAD; 20 January 2025. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025
UNCTAD. (2025b). World Investment Report 2025: International Investment in the Digital Economy. Geneva: United Nations; 2025. Regional investment trends and developing Asia evidence. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025.
UNCTAD. (2025c). World investment report 2025: International investment in the digital economy |. UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025.
UNCTAD. (2026, July 7). World investment report 2026: International investment in a turbulent era |. UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2026-international-investment-turbulent-era.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Islam, Syed Adeel Ahmad Bukhari, Abdul Rehman, Muhammad Saleem, Ahmad Waleed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


