Nepotism, Cronyism, and Organizational Commitment among Rescue Workers: A Comparative Analysis of Contractual and Regular Employees

RESEARCH DIALOGUE REAL-WORLD IMPACT

Contributors

  • Ishtiaq Ahmad PhD Scholar, Department of Psychology, Hazara University Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Sumaira Naz Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Hazara University Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Shagufta Parveen Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Hazara University Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Keywords
Nepotism Cronyism Organizational Commitment Contractual Employees Regular Employees Rescue 1122

Abstract

This study focused on the relationship between perceived nepotism, organizational cronyism, and organizational commitment among Rescue 1122 workers, while comparing the relationships between these factors among workers with different types of employment (contractual and regular). The design used was quantitative and correlational, in which 400 rescue workers were selected from Pakistan with one year of work experience. Standardized self-report measures of nepotism, organizational cronyism and organizational commitment were used to gather data. Pearson product–moment correlations and covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) were used to examine the hypothesized relationships. The results revealed that nepotism and cronyism negatively correlated with organizational commitment. Based on the structural model, organizational commitment was also found to be significantly positively predicted by job type (β = .127, p < .05). Organizational commitment was partially transmitted, as nepotism and cronyism were negatively related to commitment. The results show the importance of organizational experiences of emergency workers as a function of employment status. The available study results, however, do not report separate 'contractual' group-versus-'regular' group means, standard deviations, independent-samples tests, or effect sizes for the variables of interest, meaning that these statistics should be computed from the original data prior to making direct comparisons between groups.

References

Abubakar, A. M., Namin, B. H., Harazneh, I., Arasli, H., & Tunç, T. (2017). Does gender moderate the relationship between favoritism/nepotism, supervisor incivility, cynicism, and workplace withdrawal: A neural network and SEM approach. Tourism Management Perspectives, 23, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.06.001

Arasli, H., Altinay, L., & Arici, H. E. (2020). Seasonal employee leadership in the hospitality industry: A scale development. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2195-2215. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2019-0508

Banai, M., Reisel, W. D., & Probst, T. M. (2004). A managerial and personal control model: Predictions of work alienation and organizational commitment in Hungary. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2004.05.002

Büte, M. (2011). Perceived nepotism and its relation to job satisfaction, negative attitudes, and intention to quit. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(1), 187–203. https://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/yayin/48534386-91d1-4385-9877-967f80fe85f7/perceived-nepotism-job-satisfaction-negative-word-of-mouth-and-intention-to-quit

Chiaburu, D. S., Thundiyil, T., & Wang, J. (2014). Alienation and its correlates: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 32(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.06.003

Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

Dhar, U., Dhar, S., & Roy, S. (2002). Manual for organizational commitment scale. National Psychological Corporation.

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Khatri, N., Tsang, E. W., & Begley, T. M. (2005). Cronyism: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400171

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842

Turhan, M. (2013). Organizational cronyism: A scale development and validation from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1839-3

Corresponding Author

Ishtiaq Ahmad

PhD Scholar, Department of Psychology, Hazara University Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Corresponding Author: [email protected]

How to Cite

Ahmad, I., Naz, S., & Parveen, S. (2026). Nepotism, Cronyism, and Organizational Commitment among Rescue Workers: A Comparative Analysis of Contractual and Regular Employees. The Regional Tribune, 5(8), 238-245. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-viii.419