Environmental Governance Innovation and Community Climate Resilience: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust

RESEARCH DIALOGUE REAL-WORLD IMPACT

Contributors

  • Muhammad Arshad Lecturer, Department of Commerce, Thal University Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Abdul Rehman Khan Additional Deputy Commissioner, Govt. of the Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Rabia Chaudhary Secretariat Service, Federal Government of Pakistan, University of Reading, UK.
  • Dr. Nijah Akram HoD, Department of Architectural Engineering Technology, Punjab Tianjin University of Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Keywords
Environmental Climate Change Governance Innovation Environmental Governance Climate Risks Institutional Trust

Abstract

Environmental challenges around the world have been exacerbated by climate change, highlighting the importance of innovative form of governance that builds up the resilience of communities in their ability to survive and react to climate risks. This study explores the linkage between environmental governance innovation and community climate resilience and explores institutional trust as a possible mediator. The approach used was quantitative and data was gathered from 350 respondents in climate vulnerable communities of Pakistan using a structured questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS software through reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis and mediation analysis. The results show that innovation in environmental governance has important effects on driving community climate resilience via mechanisms of participation, transparency, collaboration and adaptive capacities. The findings also show that environmental governance innovation can have a positive impact on institutional trust, and that institutional trust could have a significant effect on improving community resilience. The findings of the mediation analysis support an understanding that trust in institutions is one important pathway for how governance innovation leads to better climate resilience outcomes. This study integrates the theories of trust-based institutional relationships into the field of environmental governance to shed light on the importance of trust-based institutional relationships to effective climate adaptation. The results indicate that participatory, transparent and inclusive governance systems are needed to boost the credibility of governance institutions and resilience of the communities to climate-related challenges.

References

Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D., & Hulme, M. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993403ps060oa

Bai, X., McPhearson, T., Cleugh, H., Nagendra, H., Tong, X., Zhu, T., & Zhu, Y. (2017). Linking urbanization and the environment: Conceptual and empirical advances. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061128

Brechin, S. R., & Bhandari, M. (2011). Perceptions of climate change worldwide. WIREs Climate Change, 2(6), 871-885. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.146

Cavalheiro, E. A., Oliveira, I. R., Leandro, D., & Kontz, L. B. (2025). Governance, development, and environment: Pathways to a sustainable future. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100813

Hickmann, T. (2021). Locating cities and their governments in multi-level sustainability governance. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3616

Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., & Pregernig, M. (2012). Legitimacy and effectiveness of environmental governance–concepts and perspectives. In Environmental Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Holley, C. (2010). Public participation, environmental law and new governance: Lessons for designing inclusive and representative participatory processes. Environmental Law and New Governance: Lessons for Designing Inclusive and Representative Participatory Processes (September 2010). Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 27(5), 360-391

Kessler, E. L. (2021). Climate change concern among youth: Examining the role of civics and institutional trust across 22 countries. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(August - December), 124. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.4849

Konisky, D. M., Milyo, J., & Richardson, L. E. (2008). Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1066-1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x

Latupeirissa, J. J., Menguito, V. T., & Valencia, E. B. (2026). Green governance in public administration: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of environmental policy implementation. Journal of Policy Studies, 41(2), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps.250295

Maeda, C. M., Namwata, B. M., & Kumburu, N. P. (2026). Local governance practices and public trust in the context of climate change adaptation in Monduli and Longido districts, Tanzania. International Review of Public Administration, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2026.2646397

Mdleleni, L., Ngcamu, B. S., & Louw, V. (2025). Innovating Climate Governance: The Role of Public Administration in Policy Coherence and Inclusive Adaptation. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives (JPADA), 10(3), 252-269

Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

Mees, H., & Driessen, P. (2018). A framework for assessing the accountability of local governance arrangements for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 671-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1428184

Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Görg, C., ... & van Bommel, S. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. Partnership for European Environmental Research.

Molenveld, A., Van Buuren, A., & Ellen, G. (2020). Governance of climate adaptation, which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation. Climatic Change, 162(2), 233-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02683-9

Newig, J., & Kvarda, E. (2012). Participation in environmental governance: legitimate and effective?. In Environmental governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: Participatory, multi‐level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.509

OECD. (2025). Government at a Glance 2025: Governing for the Green Transition.

Patterson, J., De Voogt, D. L., & Sapiains, R. (2019). Beyond inputs and outputs: Process‐oriented explanation of institutional change in climate adaptation governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(5), 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1865

Raihan, A. (2025). Frontiers in public policy: integrating sustainability, governance, and innovation for a changing world. Frontiers, 13, 14.

Ravi, K., & Brück, A. (2025). Citizen Centered Climate Intelligence: Operationalizing Open Tree Data for Urban Cooling and Eco-Routing in Indian Cities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17648. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17648

Taniguchi, H., & Marshall, G. A. (2018). Trust, political orientation, and environmental behavior. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1425275

Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., Rijswick, H. V., Buuren, A. V., Huitema, D., Meijerink, S., Rayner, T., & Wiering, M. (2011). The regional governance of climate adaptation: A framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Climate Law, 2(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1163/cl-2011-032

Tranter, B., Lester, L., Foxwell-Norton, K., & Palmer, M. A. (2023). In science we trust? Public trust in intergovernmental panel on climate change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 32(6), 691-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231165405

Trell, E., & Van Geet, M. (2019). The governance of local urban climate adaptation: Towards participation, collaboration and shared responsibilities. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(3), 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1629573

Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41

Zannakis, M., Wallin, A., & Johansson, L. (2015). Political trust and perceptions of the quality of institutional arrangements – how do they influence the public's acceptance of environmental rules. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1676

Corresponding Author

Dr. Nijah Akram

HoD, Department of Architectural Engineering Technology, Punjab Tianjin University of Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

Corresponding Author: [email protected]

How to Cite

Arshad, M., Khan, A. R., Chaudhary, R., & Akram, N. (2026). Environmental Governance Innovation and Community Climate Resilience: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust. The Regional Tribune, 5(9), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-ix.425