India’s SSBNs: Deterrence or Risk, Regional and Beyond?

Authors

  • Murad Ali Research Officer, Center for International Strategic Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Nawal Nawaz Research Assistant, Center for International Strategic Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.214

Keywords:

Deterrence, Strategic Stability, Countervalue Strike, No-First-Use, Doctrinal Shift

Abstract

India’s SSBN program does not bode well for the security calculus of the Asia-Pacific region. The security architecture of South Asia is fundamentally different from that of the Cold War era. During the Cold War, the two competing powers, the U.S. and the USSR, were geographically distant from each other. This lack of proximity between their strategic centers reduced the chances of crisis instability, miscalculation, and escalation crisis. In contrast, South Asia’s geographic contiguity, particularly between India and Pakistan, places their strategic centers in close proximity, significantly increasing the risk of crisis instability. India’s sea-based deterrent poses serious concerns for the region for two main reasons. First, the independent command and control system of SSBNs raises the issue of pre-delegation, especially if communication between the SSBNs and political leadership on land breaks down during a crisis. In such a scenario, it is unclear whether the SSBNs’       autonomous command and control system would be capable of accurately interpreting the situation. Second, India’s SSBNs, armed with sea-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) with intercontinental ranges, not only trigger an arms race within South Asia but may escalate strategic competition beyond the region. This research paper tries to critically discuss India’s sea-based deterrence under the shadow of its touted no-first-use policy. India’s doctrinal shift from countervalue second strike to counterforce stance, considering its SSBNs development. Moreover, the ranges and capability of India’s SLBMs will be discussed through the lens of India’s pursuit of prestige, and global strategic ambitions.

Author Biography

  • Murad Ali, Research Officer, Center for International Strategic Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected] 

References

Abraham, I. (1998). The making of the Indian atomic bomb: Science, secrecy and the postcolonial state. Zed Books.

Akhtar, R. (2025, July 19). The Problem with India’s New Missile Gambit. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1925251

Ali, M. (2019). What does it mean to have an Indian Naval Base in Minicoy? - Strafasia | Strategy, analysis, News and insight of Emerging Asia. Strafasia | Strategy, Analysis, News and Insight of Emerging Asia. https://strafasia.com/what-does-it-mean-to-have-an-indian-naval-base-in-minicoy/

Ali, M. (2024, December 6). India’s Nuclear Submarine Program Raises Security Concerns for Pakistan - Stratheia. Stratheia. https://stratheia.com/indias-nuclear-submarine-program-raises-security-concerns-for-pakistan/

Ali, M. (2025, July 30). Why India’s SSBNs Have Global Reach? - Stratheia. Stratheia. https://stratheia.com/why-indias-ssbns-have-global-reach/

Brahy, J. (2026). Indian Navy to test K-6 hypersonic ballistic missile for future underwater nuclear strike force. Armyrecognition.com. https://armyrecognition.com/news/navy-news/2025/indian-navy-to-test-k-6-hypersonic-ballistic-missile-for-future-underwater-nuclear-strike-force

Brands, H. (2006). Rethinking nonproliferation: LBJ, the Gilpatric Committee and U.S. national security policy. Journal of Cold War Studies, 8(2), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2006.8.2.83

Brodie, B. (1959). Strategy in the missile age. RAND Corporation.

Chengappa, R. (2002). Weapons of peace: The secret story of India’s quest to be a nuclear power. HarperCollins.

Cote, O. R., Jr. (2019). Invisible nuclear-armed submarines, or transparent oceans? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 75(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1555998

Department of Atomic Energy. (1966). Annual report 1965–66. Government of India.

Feaver, P. D. (1992–1993). Command and control in emerging nuclear nations. International Security, 17(3), 160–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539133

Foye, H. (2022). India Tests Submarine, Land Missiles | Arms Control Association. Armscontrol.org. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-11/news/india-tests-submarine-land-missiles

Ganguly, S. (1999). India’s pathway to Pokhran II: The prospects and sources of India’s nuclear weapons test. International Security, 23(4), 148–177. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539297

Gupta, S. (2024, November 25). A dangerous watershed: India’s new SSBN and the regional deterrence imbalance. South Asia Journal. https://southasiajournal.net/a-dangerous-watershed-indias-new-ssbn-and-the-regional-deterrence-imbalance/

Huth, P., & Russett, B. (1988). Deterrence failure and crisis escalation. International Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600411

Joshi, Y. (2019). Samudra: India’s convoluted path to undersea nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review, 26(5–6), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2020.1720243

Kakar, S. A., & Barech, M. H. (2025, August 11). How the World Is Ignoring a New Nuclear Trajectory in South Asia — Global Security Review. Global Security Review. https://globalsecurityreview.com/how-the-world-is-ignoring-a-new-nuclear-trajectory-in-south-asia/

Kampani, G. (2014). New Delhi's long nuclear journey: How secrecy and institutional roadblocks delayed India's Weaponization. International Security, 38(4), 79-114. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00158

Karnad, B. (2002). Nuclear weapons and Indian security: The realist foundations of strategy. Macmillan.

Kazmi, B. Z. (2025, July 24). CISS Strat Review – In Defence of Deterrence: Why India’s Operation Sindoor Marks a Dangerous Drift Toward Compellence. CISS Pakistan - Center for International Strategic Studies. https://ciss.org.pk/ciss-strat-review-in-defence-of-deterrence-why-indias-operation-sindoor-marks-a-dangerous-drift-toward-compellence/

Khan, A. A. (2023). Nuclearization of Indian Ocean region: Implications for strategic stability in South Asia. CARC Research in Social Sciences, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.58329/criss.v2i3.32

Kunde, R. (2025, July 28). DRDO next generation ICBM: A new era of strategic deterrence with advanced anti-ABM capabilities. India Defence Research Wing. https://idrw.org/drdos-next-generation-icbm-a-new-era-of-strategic-deterrence-with-advanced-anti-abm-capabilities/

Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library. (1965). Letter from Glenn Seaborg to Homi Bhabha (March 19, National Security Files, Box 25).

Mian, Z., Ramana, M. V., & Nayyar, A. H. (2019). Nuclear submarines in South Asia: New risks and dangers. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1621425

Morgan, F. E. (2008). Dangerous thresholds: Managing escalation in the 21st century. RAND Corporation.

Mueller, K. P., Castillo, J. J., Morgan, F. E., Pegahi, N., & Rosen, B. (2006). Striking first: Preemptive and preventive attack in U.S. national security policy. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG403.html

Nehru Memorial Museum and Library. (1954). Summary record of the meeting between the Planning Commission and the Atomic Energy Department held on November 30, 1954 (File No. 308, Jawaharlal Nehru Papers).

Pandit, R. (2024, August 11). India fully ready to add second nuclear submarine. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2018). Indian nuclear policy: A short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Patel, R. (2025, August 21). Indian Navy’s Third Nuclear SSBN, INS Aridhaman, Enters Final Phase of Extensive Sea Trials, Formal Induction Expected by 2025 End. Defence News India. https://defence.in/threads/indian-navys-third-nuclear-ssbn-ins-aridhaman-enters-final-phase-of-extensive-sea-trials-formal-induction-expected-by-2025-end.15299/

Perkovich, G. (2002). India’s nuclear bomb: The impact on global nuclear proliferation. University of California Press.

Ramana, M. V. (2012). The promise of power: Examining nuclear energy in India. Penguin.

Rehman, I. (2012). Drowning stability: The perils of naval nuclearization and brinkmanship in the Indian Ocean. Naval War College Review, 65(4), 1-25. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol65/iss4/8/

Roche, E. (2019, April 12). India could soon become a ‘NATO ally’ as U.S. lawmakers introduce a new bill. Livemint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/india-could-soon-become-a-nato-ally-as-us-lawmakersintroduce-a-new-bill-1555043662163.html

Schelling, T. C. (2021). The threat that leaves something to chance. RAND Corporation.

Tellis, A. J. (2002). India’s emerging nuclear posture: Between recessed deterrence and ready arsenal. RAND Corporation.

The Times of India. (2024, August 29). India commissions INS Arighat: Know all about Navy’s second nuclear-powered submarine.

Wueger, D. (2016). India’s nuclear-armed submarines: Deterrence or danger? The Washington Quarterly, 39(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660x.2016.1232636

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ali, M., & Nawaz, N. (2026). India’s SSBNs: Deterrence or Risk, Regional and Beyond?. The Regional Tribune, 5(1), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.214