The Evolution of Political Communication as an Academic Discipline: Media Infrastructures, War, and the Making of an Interdisciplinary Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.218Keywords:
Political Communication, Genealogy, Propaganda, Journalism Studies, Mass Communication, Public Opinion, Cold War, Digital PoliticsAbstract
Political communication is becoming an interdisciplinary research field but somehow histories either diminish its evolution to a media-effects line or provide a disjointed catalogue of theories. The paper provides an evolutionary genealogy which reinvents political communication as a hybrid field of studies due to the transformation of media infrastructures, war, ideological conflict and the transformation of models of the citizen and of the public opinion. The discussion starts with Greek and Roman rhetoric as the initial theories of civic persuasion and then the non-Western traditions of symbolic governance to prevent being confined to a highly Eurocentric origin story. It is followed decade after decade, tracing the development of interwar propaganda research and the theory of the public opinion, wartime persuasion studies, Cold war press-system thinking and comparative agendas, the effects researches of the television, the sociology of news rooms, the agenda setting, framing and priming, and the subsequent mediatisation and the digital transformation as cumulative developments in the development of the field. The article posits that political communication has developed by the process of accretion as opposed to paradigm shift. Its long-standing definitional dispute is a product of structural interdisciplinarity, which is formed through the intersection of journalism studies, mass communication research, political science, sociology and behavioural and social psychology. Instead of putting forward a single definition of coherence in political communication, it suggests that the major concern of coherence in political communication is a recurrence of problem spaces of communication to legitimacy, power, and judgement of the people in the changing media environments.
References
Aday, S., Farrell, H., Lynch, M., Sides, J., Kelly, J., & Zuckerman, E. (2010) Blogs and bullets: new media in contentious politics. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Ali, S., Carter, E. L., Rehman, A., & Irfan, M. (2025). Crisis communication competencies in journalism education: a curricular analysis of crisis-related instruction in journalism and mass communication programs in Pakistan. Physical Education, Health and Social Sciences, 3(4), 662–681, available: https://journal-of-social-education.org/index.php/Jorunal/article/view/936
Ali, S., Hassan, K., Irfan, M., Latif, F. and Shakoor, A. (2023). Regulatory and technological challenges to Urdu journalism in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Russian Law Journal, XI(8s), 355. https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i8s.1350
Ali, S., Sohail, M., Irfan, M., & Khan, U. (2024). Political discourse and its effects on higher education: an analytical study. International Journal of Human and Society (IJHS), 4(3), 624-643.
Almond, G.A. (1990) A discipline divided: schools and sects in political science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Aristotle (2007) On rhetoric: a theory of civic discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayub, R., Ali, S., Irfan, M., Hamza, M., & Hadi, F. (2025). News Gathering and Usage of New Technology among Local Journalists: Problems and Challenges. Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 2596-2611. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.14176
Bajwa, A., Marwan, A. H., Ali, S., & Irfan, M. (2022). Role of Press in Political Socialization of Youth of Pakistan During 2018 Elections. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language, 7(7). https://www.pjsel.jehanf.com/index.php/journal/article/view/749.
Barber, B. R. (1998). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political science quarterly, 113(4), 573-589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658245
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Berelson, B. (1959). The state of communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/266840
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright.
Blumler, J. G. (2016). The fourth age of political communication. Politiques de communication, No 6(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.3917/pdc.006.0019
Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
Cantril, H., & Allport, G.W. (1935). The psychology of radio. New York: Harper.
Chafee, S.H. (1975). Political communication: issues and strategies for research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cicero. (2001). On the ideal orator. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dearing, J.W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DeFleur, M. L., & Lowery, S. A. (1995). Milestones in communication research: media effects. New York: Longman.
Deutsch, K. W. (1965). The nerves of government: models of political communication and control. New York: Free Press.
Edelman, M. (1985). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 41-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60212-9
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of peace research, 2(1), 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
Gans, H.J. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Herbst, S. (1995). Numbered voices. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305540018966x
Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Creating the hybrid field of political communication, In Kenski, K., & Jamieson, K. H. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-Date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1, Anniversary Issue Devoted to Twenty Years of Public Opinion Research), 61. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
Katz, E. (1987). Communications research since lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4 PART 2), S25-S45. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/51.4_part_2.s25
Kenski, K., & Jamieson, K. H. (eds.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030
Koster, J. (2003). Ritual performance and the politics of identity: On the functions and uses of ritual. (2003). Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 4(2), 211–248. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.2.05kos
Lasswell, H. D. (1927). The theory of political propaganda. The American Political Science Review, 21(3), 627–631. https://doi.org/10.2307/1945515
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society, in Bryson, L. (ed.) The communication of ideas. New York: Harper, 37–51.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
O'Keefe, G. J., Mendelsohn, H., & Liu, J. (1976). Voter decision making 1972 and 1974. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(3), 320. https://doi.org/10.1086/268308
Patterson, T.E., & McClure, R. D. (1976) The unseeing eye. New York: Putnam.
Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2004). Theoretical diversity in political communication, in Kaid, L.L. (ed.) Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3–16.
Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344389011003002
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sparks, C. (2001). The internet and the global public sphere, in Bennett, W.L. and Entman, R.M. (eds.) Mediated politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–95.
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2012). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news. New York: Free Press.
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
White, D. M. (1950). The “Gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403
You, X. (2006). The Way, multimodality of ritual symbols, and social change: reading Confucius's Analects as a rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 36(4), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940600868028
Zaller, J. (1998). The rule of product substitution in presidential campaign news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716298560001009
Zeng, D., Chen, H., Lusch, R., & Li, S.-H. (2010). Social Media Analytics and Intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2010.151
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
