Brand Defaming and Identity in Digital Society: A Semiotic Analysis of Temu Memes

Authors

  • Dr. Naheed Ashfaq Assistant Professor, School of Liberal Arts (SLA), University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Syeda Faiza Babar Lecturer, University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Sadia Noreen Lecturer, School of Liberal Arts (SLA), University of Management and Technology, Lahore. Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.225

Keywords:

Temu, Digital Platform, Memes, Digital Culture, Defame

Abstract

Memes, as symbolic media, are a multifaceted form of communication, spanning from entertainment and humor to social commentary and persuasive influence on their audience, ultimately shaping the digital culture. Recently, Temu, an online shopping platform, has expanded massively in Pakistan. The paper explores the impact of Temu memes in shaping digital culture by hypothetically defaming the platform’s brand identity. Drawing on van Dijk’s mental model theory (1983) the study investigates the impact of Temu memes on consumer behavior and their contribution to brand defamation. This qualitative research employs a descriptive method; 10 popular memes (both English and Urdu) have been selected for analysis. The findings reveal that Temu memes are a source of relatability among their audience and contribute significantly to social knowledge. In addition, as a means of self-expression, Temu memes not only serve the purpose of humor and entertainment but also foster a sense of skepticism surrounding the platform's brand reputation. Future researchers aiming to study the broader impact of social media on consumer culture can benefit from the study.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Naheed Ashfaq, Assistant Professor, School of Liberal Arts (SLA), University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2020). Mental model theory as a model for analysing visual and multimodal discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.012

Bhattacharya, P. (2019). Social degeneration through social media: A study of the adverse impact of ‘Memes’. 2019 Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), 44-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/itt48889.2019.9075096

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.

Hassan, I. (2022). Discourse analysis of selected memes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cognitive linguistics perspective. Beni-Suef University International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.21608/buijhs.2023.99755.1092

Javed, M., Jamil, M. B., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Meme as a tool of social and political commentary: discourse analysis of memes in Pakistani social media. Pakistan Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.37605/pjhssr.v5i2.321

Kariko, A. A. T. (2014, December 18). Analysis on internet memes using semiotics. English Department of Binus University.

Leiser, A. (2022). Psychological perspectives on participatory culture: Core motives for the use of political internet memes. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6377

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.

Sulhan, I. (2016, November 9). Internet Meme Analysis: Interpretative Semiotic Analysis on the "Scumbag Steve". Communicare: Journal of Communication Studies, 3(1), 21-36. https://journal.lspr.edu/index.php/communicare/article/view/7

Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Mental models and discourse comprehension: A cognitive approach. Springer.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Qureshi, N. A., Babar, S. F., & Noreen, S. (2026). Brand Defaming and Identity in Digital Society: A Semiotic Analysis of Temu Memes. The Regional Tribune, 5(1), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.225