Election 2026: Public Expectations, Electoral Transparency, and Political Preferences in Gilgit-Baltistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-i.230Keywords:
Electoral Transparency, Political Participation, Indigenous Political Representation, Federal Political Influence, Voting Behavior, Democratic Perceptions, Gilgit-BaltistanAbstract
This study explores public perceptions, electoral expectations, political preferences, and attitudes toward transparency and representation ahead of Gilgit-Baltistan's elections. It aims to understand how citizens view electoral transparency, federal influence, indigenous representation, and voting behavior in this unique context. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey via Google Forms, data from 314 respondents across various districts were analyzed with SPSS. Results show moderate to high electoral excitement and participation but low confidence in transparency and fairness. Public perception indicates strong federal influence on electoral outcomes and support for indigenous representation and local leadership, reflecting regional awareness. Candidate traits like personality, reputation, and promises influenced voting more than party affiliation. The study adds empirical insights into electoral politics and democratic views in Gilgit-Baltistan, underscoring the need for greater transparency, institutional credibility, local representation, and development to enhance democratic trust and legitimacy.
References
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992337
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (5th ed.). CQ Press.
Hooghe, M., Marien, S., & Oser, J. (original author Daniel Devine. )(2024). Does political trust matter? A meta-analysis on the consequences of trust. Political Behavior, 46, 2241–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09916-y
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Hunzai, I. H. (2013). Conflict dynamics in Gilgit-Baltistan. United States Institute of Peace.
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
Marien, S. (2011). The effect of electoral outcomes on political trust: A multi–level analysis of 23 countries. Electoral Studies, 30(4), 712-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.015
Mauk, M. (2020). Electoral integrity matters: How electoral process conditions the relationship between political losing and political trust. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1709-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01050-1
Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, territory, identity: Politics of West European peripheries. Sage Publications.
Schedler, A. (2002). The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0031
Shafqat, S. (2019). Political system of Pakistan and public policy. Progressive Publishers.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Van der Meer, T., & Hakhverdian, A. (2016). Political trust as the evaluation of process and performance: A cross-national study of 42 European countries. Political Studies, 65(1), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715607514
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row.
Wattenberg, M. P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
