Servants, Selfhood, and the Limits of Love: Caste, Class, and the Cinematic Politics of Domestic Labor in Rohena Gera's Sir (2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-iv.239Keywords:
Indian Cinema, Domestic Workers, Caste, Class, Intersectionality, HabitusAbstract
Paid domestic work is one of the largest sectors of women's employment in urban India, yet it remains one of the least visible in popular Hindi cinema, where servants tend to occupy episodic, decorative roles, and the structural conditions of their labor are seldom interrogated. This article examines Rohena Gera's Sir (2018), an internationally circulated, woman-directed independent film that places a live-in domestic worker at the center of its narrative and uses the conventions of cross-class romance to stage a careful argument about the politics of servitude. The analysis is built on a qualitative film study that combines close textual reading of the complete dialogue transcript with reflexive thematic analysis of representative sequences and reads the resulting themes through two complementary lenses: Bourdieu's theory of capital and habitus, and the intersectional framework associated with Crenshaw. Findings show that the film maps the master–servant relation through tightly interlocking spatial, embodied, and linguistic boundaries that polite employer behaviour does not dissolve; that it traces the intersecting effects of class, gender, widowhood, and migration on the worker's aspiration without collapsing them into a single grievance; and that it engages the unlikely-couple tradition only to refuse its standard romantic resolution and to relocate the worker's mobility outside the employer's gift. The article contributes to media and social-science scholarship by showing how an arthouse Indian film can politicize the silence around domestic labor, by extending the conversation on cross-class romance as social criticism, and by offering a model for reading representation alongside the empirical literature on paid care work.
References
Anwer, M., & Arora, A. (2022). Love, interrupted: Caste and couple-formation in new Bollywood. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 39(3), 615–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2020.1867476
Arora, A. (2023). Caste, gender, and labour: A case study of dalit women domestic workers. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 5(2), 19-21. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2023.v5.i2a.252
Banerjee, S., & Wilks, L. (2022). Work in pandemic times: Exploring precarious continuities in paid domestic work in India. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(4), 1505-1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12858
Bhan, G., Ravindranath, D., Chowdhury, A. R., Mehra, R., Sinha, D., Kiran, A., & Malladi, T. (2022). Deficits in decent work: employer perspectives and practices on the quality of employment in domestic work in urban India. International Labor Organization.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chatterjee, A. (2026). Attachment, Aspiration, and Inequality in Domestic Labor in India. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003615446
Cochrane, B. (2013). Taking Bourdieu to the Movies: Understanding Cinema as a Spatial and Embodied Practice [Doctoral dissertation, University of London]. https://oro.open.ac.uk/61734/1/13835981.pdf
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Dasgupta, S. (2021, January 27). Analysis of Sir (2018): Blatant invisibilisation of caste privilege. Feminism in India. https://feminisminindia.com/2021/01/27/sir-2018-movie-analysis/
Dey, A., & Orton, B. (2016). Gender and Caste Intersectionality in India: An Analysis of the Nirbhaya Case, 16 December 2012. In Gender and Race Matter: Global Perspectives on Being a Woman (pp. 87–105). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-212620160000021006
Frøystad, K. (2003). Master-Servant relations and the domestic reproduction of caste in Northern India. Ethnos, 68(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014184032000060371
Gera, R. (Director). (2018). Sir [Film]. Inkpot Films.
Grover, S., Chambers, T., & Jeffery, P. (2018). Portraits of Women’s Paid Domestic-Care Labor. Journal of South Asian Development, 13(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174118793782
Gupta, C. (2018). Domestic Anxieties, Recalcitrant Intimacies: Representation of Servants in Hindi Print Culture of Colonial India. Studies in History, 34(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0257643018762939
Jisha, V. G., Excelce, A. J., Maria Delicia Helina, G., Gnanasumathi, S., Somasundaram, T., & Prasanna, P. (2026). Issues and Challenges of Women Domestic Workers: An Analysis. In R. El Khoury (Ed.), Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Empowering Business Through Technology: Innovations Shaping Our Future (Vol. 620, pp. 829–836). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02056-7_67
McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: A beginner's guide. SAGE Publications.
Nair, G., & Hofman, N. G. (2022). Middle-class Women and Domestic Work in India and the United States: Caste, Race and Patriarchy. Sociological Bulletin, 71(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380229211063157
Nath, I. (2021, January 19). Netflix’s Sir: The Indian audience’s fascination with the rich-man-loves-poor-girl trope. Feminism in India. https://feminisminindia.com/2021/01/20/sir-netflix-film-analysis-review/
Neetha, N., & Palriwala, R. (2011). The Absence of State Law: Domestic Workers in India. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.23.1.097
Öksüz Karademir, C., & Kaya, M. (2020). Sınıf Eşitsizliğinin Bourdieu’nun Sermaye ve Habitus Kavramları Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi: Parazit Filminin Betimsel Analizi. TRT Akademi, 5(10), 644-667. https://izlik.org/JA97AD86RA
Raghuram, P. (2001). Caste and Gender in the Organisation of Paid Domestic Work in India. Work, Employment and Society, 15(3), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170122119011
Reay, D. (2018). A Life Lived in Class: The Legacy of Resistance and the Enduring Power of Reproduction. PRISM: Casting New Light on Learning, Theory and Practice, 2(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.prism.vol2iss1article287
Sharma, S. (2016). Of rasoi ka kaam/bathroom ka kaam: Perspectives of women domestic workers. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(7), 52-61.
Sharma, S. (2022). Domestic workers, class-hegemony, and the Indian state: a sociological perspective on ideology. South Asian History and Culture, 13(4), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2068481
Sharot, S. (2013). Wealth and/or Love: Class and Gender in the Cross-class Romance Films of the Great Depression. Journal of American Studies, 47(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875812001740
Singh, A., & Abdul Azeez, E. P. (2021). Caste in contemporary Bollywood movies: An analysis of the portrayal of characters. Asian Journal of Social Science, 49(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2021.01.003
Thakkar, S. (2024). Exploitation, Harassment and Violence: Lived Experiences of Women Paid Domestic Workers in India. Journal of South Asian Development, 19(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741231164872
Vanina, E. Y. (2023). Top & Bottom: Indian Servants and Masters on Screen. Part I. Oriental Courier(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.18254/S268684310026694-1
Wartenberg, T. E. (1999). Unlikely couples: Movie romance as social criticism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503320
Wilks, L. (2020). Gender and domestic work in India. In S. Huang & K. N. Ruwanpura (Eds.), Handbook on Gender in Asia. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112918.00022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


