Gendered Ecological Authority in Louise Erdrich’s Tracks: A Crenshawian Intersectional Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-iii.274Keywords:
Tracks, Crenshaw, Intersectionality, Gendered Ecological Authority,, Fleur Pillager, Native American Women, Belsey, AnishinaabeAbstract
Drawing on Crenshaw's (1989, 1991) intersectional approach, this article explores how Erdrich’s Tracks (1988) can be read as a question of gendered ecological authority. It is here where Fleur Pillager and Margaret Kashpaw are seen as possessing a form of cultural authority that is produced at the intersection of race, gender, and ecological custodianship, which has not been sufficiently theorized in the field so far. The research method, Belsey’s (2005) model of textual analysis, shows that the colonial attack on these women is aimed at this intersection: the sexual, ecological, and linguistic elements are attacked at the same time because they are simultaneously constituted. Findings show that Fleur's knowledge of bear-clan medicine, the nature of her relationship with Matchimanito, Margaret's warrior tradition, and Nanapush's matrilineal naming of Lulu are formal enactments of the principle that ecological sovereignty and cultural survival go hand in hand in the Anishinaabe world. The article presents an original extended intersectional approach, with the addition of ecological custodianship as a fourth analytical dimension in addition to race, gender, and class.
References
Allen, P. G. (1992). The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Beacon Press.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
Beidler, P. G., & Barton, G. (Eds.). (2006). A reader’s guide to the novels of Louise Erdrich. University of Missouri Press.
Belsey, C. (2005). Culture and the real: Theorizing cultural criticism. Routledge.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
Erdrich, L. (1988). Tracks. Henry Holt.
Hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
Orange, T. (2018). There there. Knopf.
Owens, L. (1992). Other destinies: Understanding the American Indian novel. University of Oklahoma Press.
Rainwater, C. (1990). Reading between worlds: Narrativity in the fiction of Louise Erdrich. American Literature, 62(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.2307/2927133
Ruppert, J. (1995). Mediation in contemporary Native American fiction. University of Oklahoma Press.
Silko, L. M. (1977). Ceremony. Viking Press.
Stookey, L. L. (1999). Louise Erdrich: A critical companion. Greenwood Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


