Language Contact and Syntactic Complexity: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Clause Structure in Pakistani English Research Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-vii.332Keywords:
Syntactic Complexity, Language Contact, That-clause, Pakistani English, Clausal ComplexityAbstract
The study investigates the syntactic complexity in Pakistani research articles. The focus of the research is on academic texts produced by Pakistani scholars and published in international journals. A mixed-methods research design is employed to examine the factors contributing to syntactic complexity in Pakistani English academic writing. This research mainly focuses on the complementation clause (that-clause) and other embedded clauses, which contribute to the syntactic complexity in writing. The syntactic measurement is examined using the key indices of Lu (2010), which present a statistical analysis of clausal structure. In this perspective, Weinrich’s (2010) syntactic theory is used to explain the qualitative findings. The sample for the study comprises internationally published research articles with Pakistani 1st author publications. The articles are converted into a specialized corpus. There are 96 files or research articles included in the study. Examples of clauses are extracted using AntConc (3.5.9). The findings reveal that dominant complementation clauses are prevalent in Pakistani academic writing. The syntactic structure is often complex, which highlights the embedding of local languages. In academic discourse, language is strongly influenced by a multilingual perspective (Weinrich, 2010). Pakistani English is a highly contact language, and studying it is very significant from an academic writing perspective.
References
Ahmad, A., Hussan, S., & Butt, A. (2020). English in the Domain of Legal Services: Problems of Access in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 109-127.
Anwar, B., Ajmal, M., & Keezhatta, M. S. (2020). Nativization of grammatical features in Pakistani English. Asian EFL Journal, 27(42), 92-106.
Anwar, B., Malik, N. A., & Shahbaz, M. (2020). Innovative syntactic features of Pakistan English newspapers. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 23(1). https://kjlr.pk/kjlr/article/view/36
Arif, M., Anwar, B., & Shahid, U. (2026). Functional variation in lexical bundles: A corpus-based comparative analysis of native and non-native web-based English. Social Sciences Spectrum, 5(1), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.05.01.506
Baumgardner, R. J. (1993). The English language in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Bernardo, A. S. (2023). Philippine English and global englishes-inspired grammar teaching. Asian Englishes, 26(1), 174-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2023.2174532
BIBER, D., GRAY, B., & POONPON, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Bjork, B. C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2009). Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 14(1).
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. Language Learning & Language Teaching, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Butt, B., & Anwar, B. (2019). NDTs in non-native English: A syntactic analysis. Global Regional Review, IV(IV), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2019(iv-iv).33
Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2006). Developing Chinese scientists’ skills for publishing in English: Evaluating collaborating-colleague workshops based on genre analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.002
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474-509. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042
Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman's “Stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.002
GRANGER, S., & TYSON, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non‐native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1996.tb00089.x
Huang, X., Li, J., Wu, J., Chang, J., Liu, D., & Zhu, K. (2024). Flexibly utilizing syntactic knowledge in aspect-based sentiment analysis. Information Processing & Management, 61(3), 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103630
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2016a). Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Imran, M., & Wahid, M. R. (2020). The syntactic variations in adjective phrase–double comparatives and double superlatives in Pakistani English (PakE): A corpus-based study. American Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 1-11.
Ingvarsdóttir, H., & Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2013). ELF and academic writing: A perspective from the expanding circle. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2013-0006
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. University of Illinois Press.
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2016). ELF in the making? Simplification and hybridity in abstract writing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 53-81. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2016-0003
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
Mansoor, S. (2005). Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
Martínez, A. (2018). Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2015). Looking into ELF variants: A study of evaluative it-clauses in research articles. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 3(2), 160-179.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Pallotti, G. (2014). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435
Shahid, U., Anwar, B., El-Dakhs, D. A., & Younas, M. (2026). Complexity in academic discourse: A corpus-based analysis of nominal groups in English research articles. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102337
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D. Z. (2013). What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.91
Trudgill, P. (1999). New-dialect formation and Dedialectalization. Journal of English Linguistics, 27(4), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754249922004741
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed. & Trans.; Original work published 1934).
Weinreich, U. (2010). Languages in contact: Findings and problems (No. 1). Walter de Gruyter.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawai'i Press.
Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a Lingua Franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798
Yoon, S., & Park, S. (2021). Grammatical complexity of EFL learners’ casual conversation at different proficiency levels. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 599-616. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202107.599
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mairam Arif, Behzad Anwar, Uswa Shahid, Quratulain Cheema
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
