Ideology and Cultural Bias in the Representation of Culture-Specific Words in English-Urdu Bilingual Dictionaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/trt/v-vii.345Keywords:
Ideology and Cultural Bias, Culture-Specific Words, English-Urdu Bilingual DictionariesAbstract
The current study investigates the ways in which culture-specific words have been represented in English-Urdu bilingual dictionaries and how the dictionary entry represents the cultural meaning. Language and culture are interconnected, and a large number of words have meanings that are embedded in social traditions, religious practices and values. These words may present problems of translation since they do not convey their true cultural context. The present study centers on the selected culture specific words extracted from two commonly used bilingual dictionaries, namely (1) Oxford English Urdu Dictionary (2) Rekhta English Urdu Dictionary. The study is a qualitative type of study. Data collection involves semi-structured interviews with students, teachers and bilingual dictionaries users who work with them on a regular basis for learning and translation. The participants' answers are analyzed using thematic analysis to detect themes on cultural representation, translation problems and the effectiveness of the dictionary. In conclusion, the results show that bilingual dictionaries do not adequately explain the cultural background of the words and mostly offer short or literal translations. This consequently leads to a miss-understanding of the emotional, religious and cultural interpretations of culture-specific expressions by users. The study underlines the significance of culturally sensitive lexicographic practices and suggests that the bilingual dictionary should contain context explanations, cultural notes and usage examples. This research will be helpful for translation studies, lexicography and cultural linguistics as it focuses on the role of bilingual dictionaries as linguistic tools and also as a bridge between cultures.
References
Ahmad, Z., & Khan, I. (2024). English Loanwords in Urdu language: A study of borrowing. JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v10i1.6020
Ali, S. S. (2022). Semantic gaps in bilingual Urdu to English and English to Urdu dictionaries. Journal of Research in Humanities.
Aslam, M., Tahir, A., & Qadeer, A. (2019). Reconceptualization of lexicography: An analysis of monolingual and bilingual Pakistani dictionaries. Erevna: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 19–36. http://journals.au.edu.pk/ojserevna/index.php/erevna/article/view/74
Atkins, B. S., & Rundell, M. (2008). The Oxford guide to practical lexicography. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2018). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. 3rd Edition, Routledge, London and New York.
Bhatti, A. M., Rana, D. A. M. K., & Cheema, A. U. (2022). Lexicography of Pakistani languages: A case of Punjabi and Siraiki languages. Khoj, 43(1). https://khoj.ipcs.edu.pk/website/journal/article/633e6f816e656/page
Hall, M., & Louw, P. (2022). The perceived impacts of a bilingual learner’s dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 35(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecac002
Landau, S. I. (2001). Dictionaries: The art and craft of lexicography (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Lew, R. (2024). Dictionaries and lexicography in the AI era. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 426. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02889-7
Lew, R., & Szarowska, A. (2015). The case for bilingual learners’ dictionaries. ELT Journal, 69(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu038
Li, Q., & Tarp, S. (2022). Differentiated treatment of cultural items in lexicographical products: A necessary adaptation to the digital environment. Lexikos, 32, 90–117. https://doi.org/10.5788/32-1-1706
Li, Q., & Xia, Y. (2020). Equivalent varieties for culture-specific words in Chinese English dictionaries. Lexicographica, 36, 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2020-0007
Liu, L. (2018). Partial equivalences in bilingual dictionaries: Classification, causes and compensations. Lingua, 214, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.08.001
Nied Curcio, M. (2023). Lexicography, culture and mediation: Or why a good lexicographer must also be a good cultural mediator. Lexikos, 33(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.5788/33-2-1842
Prószéky, G., Héja, E., & Lipp, V. (2023). Bilingual lexicography. In Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Reichmann, O. (2023). The lexicon and culture Culture and the lexicon. Lexicographica, 39(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/lex-2023-0003
Saleem, M. I. (2007). Bilingual lexicography: Some issues with modern English Urdu lexicography—A user's perspective. Linguistik Online, 31(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.31.545
Sher, A. (2022). The technical principles of bilingual lexicography (In the context of Urdu and Pashto bilingual lexicography). Makhz, 3(II). https://doi.org/10.47205/makhz.2022(3-ii)26
Venuti, L. (1995). The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation. Routledge.
Wan, J. (2021). On CEDU's treatment of culture-bound lexical items under the beyond-equivalence principle. Lexicography, 8(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1558/lexi.20992
Zhao, C. (2024). Making known the what and the why: On foregrounding cultural information in cross-cultural lexicography. Lexicography, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/lexi.27596
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


